Katie Stember
About Katie Stember
Katie Stember serves as the Associate Director of Life Science Economic Development at the North Carolina Biotechnology Center, where she has worked since 2018. With a background in pathology and neuroscience, she is dedicated to science outreach and advocates for increased engagement of scientists in science policy.
Work at North Carolina Biotechnology Center
Katie Stember serves as the Associate Director of Life Science Economic Development at the North Carolina Biotechnology Center. She has held this position since 2018, contributing to the advancement of life sciences in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. In her role, she focuses on fostering economic development within the life sciences sector, promoting collaboration between academic institutions and industry stakeholders.
Education and Expertise
Katie Stember earned her Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Pathology/Experimental Pathology from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where she studied from 2014 to 2018. Prior to this, she obtained a Bachelor of Science in Behavioral Neuroscience from Northeastern University, completing her degree in 2012. Additionally, she studied at Bond University for 11 months in 2010, further enhancing her academic background.
Background
Katie Stember began her career in research at Massachusetts General Hospital, where she worked as a Research Assistant from 2011 to 2012 and later as a Laboratory Technician from 2012 to 2014. Following her time at Massachusetts General Hospital, she pursued graduate studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, which led to her current role at the North Carolina Biotechnology Center.
Achievements
Katie Stember is passionate about science outreach and education, with a focus on increasing public understanding and support for scientific endeavors. She advocates for scientists to engage more actively in science policy, emphasizing the importance of maintaining America's leadership in science and technology. Her efforts aim to bridge the gap between scientific research and public engagement.